In a Personal Correspondence (Abridged) - Julian Doyle

If Jesus was a God then he cannot have been killed - you can't kill a God or I doubt if you can even make him bleed. If he died then he was not a God. If he resurrected then he just joins all the hundreds of resurrections in the Bible. But of course, we know that resurrection is a semi masonic resurrection using the Lion’s paw grip.

When Jesus tells his disciples “Lazarus is dead”, Thomas says, “Let us also go, that we may die with him.” What can Thomas possibly mean by that? The answer comes from the rituals of the Freemasons. In third degree initiation the Lodge is darkened and the novitiate, who is about to be made a Master Mason, is laid to death under a shroud with a skull and crossed bones over his head. Then while one Master offers a secret grip, the novitiate is hinged up from the grave by the Masters, as the magic words are said, resurrecting him back to life as a Master Mason. That would certainly make sense as to why the others would want to die and be resurrected into the next stage of initiation.

 

If you want to understand Jesus’ crucifixion, then you need to understand the monumental secret known by the original Templar knights. That this secret has so often been hinted at, even into modern days where an article in the Guardian newspaper in 1976, following the immanent excommunication of Archbishop Lefebvre, to their surprise the Pope suddenly backed down. The Archbishop’s team of priests in England, believe their leader still has a powerful ecclesiastical weapon to use in his dispute with the Vatican. No one will give any hint at its nature, but team leader Father Peter Morgan, describes it as being something ‘earthshattering.’ (Guardian 1976) Those trying to fathom the mystery have, at best, come up with the story that Jesus was married and had a child, but we will show why this is very unlikely. Or that he was drugged to survive the crucifixion, but when one unravels the heretical Templar beliefs this also becomes very improbable. But you can discover the Monumental Secret here. https://www.amazon.com/dp/1986085694

 

The Apostles Creed starts with:

1. We believe in one God,

2. the Father, the sum of all powers,

And continues with: (numbered for convenience)

16. he came down

17. and became flesh

18. and became human.

19. and suffered death

20. and rose again the third day

Nothing that surprising in this is there?

But wait for it: fifty years later in Constantinople in AD 381 at the second Ecumenical Council certain changes were made to the creed; changes, which must have been important for them to be added to the original creed. Did I say important I mean extraordinarily important!

16. he came down from the air-and-sky

18. from the Holy Spirit and Mary the Virgin

20. He was crucified for us under Pontius Pilate

21. and suffered death and was buried

22. and rose again the third day as written

So there you have it, in AD 381, some 350 years after the events; and at the same time Crucifixion paintings began to appear, the Crucifixion of Jesus by Pilate suddenly became a new matter of faith. That Jesus was the Son of God should be a matter of faith. Belief in the resurrection from death should be a matter of faith. That Jesus turned water into wine is a matter of faith. But Pilate crucifying Jesus is not a matter of faith! It is either a historical fact or it is not a fact. There is only one possible conclusion to draw from this and that is, that it was clearly not accepted as a fact by many people and therefore had to be forced on them as a matter of faith. Anyone who did not accept the Nicene Creed would be excommunicated and, right up to the Middle Ages could be burnt to death as a heretic. Remember Priscillian, the Christian Bishop of Avila, was killed by the Church of Rome as a heretic just four years after the second Ecumenical Council announced that, ‘Jesus crucified by Pilate’ was a matter of faith.

It is easy to show Jesus was alive after Pilate left Judea - just read Josephus and notice Philip dies in 34 AD and his wife Herodius marries Herod. The Baptist complains about the marriage and is finally jailed. Herod's original wife goes back to her father, King Aretus of Petra. He attacks Herod and destroys his army in 37 AD. Tiberius sends Vitellius to punish Aretus but before he arrives news comes that Tiberius died. (March AD37) Josephus writes that the people thought Herod’s army was defeated because he killed the Baptist. So the Baptist could not have been killed more than 6 months before the destruction of Herod’s army. So Jesus started his ministry after the Baptists death in 36/37. After Pilate left in 36 AD.

People believe the story, created in Rome, and forced on the world by murder and torture but the real story of Jesus is much more inspiring. He was a much more important person than those stories from Rome of virgin births and resurrections from the dead - and not believed by the Gnostics or The Bethany family. 

‘Of all charges levelled against the Templars, the most serious were those of blasphemy and heresy – of denying, trampling and spitting on the cross. It is not clear what precisely this alleged ritual was intended to signify – what, in other words, the Templars were actually repudiating. Were they repudiating Christ? Or were they simply repudiating the crucifixion? And whatever they repudiated, what exactly did they extol in its stead? No one has satisfactorily answered those question.’(H.B.H.G. Baigent, Leigh & Lincoln)

 

 The original Templars were followers of Notre Dame who was Mary Magdalene - who was a Jewess who travelled to France with Martha and Lazarus. That is why at the council of Troyes in 1129 an oath was imposed on all new Templars: ‘Obedience to Bethany, the castle of Mary and Martha’

The misinformation suggesting the 9 Knights who were guarding roads we know was not so. If the Templars spent nine years guarding the roads in Palestine, why on their return to France did their patron and protector, St. Bernard de Clairvaux write: ‘The work has been accomplished with our help, and the Knights have been sent on a journey through France and Burgundy, under the protection of the Count of Champagn, where all precautions can be taken against interference by public or ecclesiastical authority.’ ‘The work has been accomplished?’ What work? Certainly pilgrims were still visiting Jerusalem traveling on these dangerous roads. This does not sound like the return of Knights who have been guarding those roads, so can we take it for granted that the Templar’s ‘work had been accomplished’ and they had found what they were looking for, precious items, treasure and documents that perhaps contained heretical information that needed to be kept out of the hands of the ecclesiastical authorities? That the Templars became rich and powerful clearly answers that question. I should add that Troyes was the the seat of the court of the Count of Champagn and interestingly it was Chrétian of Troyes who wrote one of the earliest Grail romances, which figured the Templars as the guardians of the Grail. The Count made Troyes, a centre of Cabalistic and esoteric studies as early as 1070. Central to this was a Rabbi probably known even today by Orthodox Jews as Solomon of Troyes, or Rabbi Rashid. Rashid was author of a commentary on the Talmud which has been included in every edition of the Talmud since its first printing in the 1520s. I can't give you all the historical information I have but a publishing house at the moment is looking into a book of mine on the Templars. I would also suggest a visit to Rosslyn Chapel in Scotland where you can find the direct link between the Templars and the Freemasons who maintain the secret rituals of the Templars who I am afraid denied the cross as any book on the Templars all admit. They also were Johnnies considering John the Baptist more important than Jesus. A visit to the Magdalene church at Rennes le Chateaux will confirm this where the Baptist statue confirms this.

 

 NOTRE DAME is Mary Magdalene. Not only do they invent the idea she was a prostitute which is not in the Bible they have also made a clear attempt to remove Notre Dame from her title and suggest it is the Virgin Mother. Why? To answer this one needs to go back to The Jewish war of 66 AD which was more than a war against the Romans it was a revolution. ‘The king’s troops, inferior now in numbers as well as courage, were driven out of the Upper City. Their opponents rushed in and burnt down the house of Ananias, the High Priest and the palace of Agrippa and Berenice; then they took their fire to the records office, eager to destroy the money lenders’ bonds and so make impossible the recovery of debts, in order to secure the support of an army of debtors and enable the poor to rise with impunity against the rich.’ (Josephus, ‘War’)The troubles started as early as 40 AD and the rich Jews migrated to Gaul as did Herod Antipas. This migration is even mentioned in the 20th degree of Freemasonry known as the ‘Grand Master’. The degree tells of the destruction of the third Temple by Titus in AD 70 and how the Brethren, sadly left the Holy Land and divided themselves into a number of lodges and dispersed around Europe. We have written evidence that there was a huge quantity of Jews in the area of the Narbonne by 600 AD as Archbishop Julian of Toledo described the region as ‘a brothel of blaspheming Jews.’ WHY blaspheming Jews? What do they know that makes them blasphemers? In fact the area became the Jewish Kingdom of Septimania after they helped King Pepin in the war against the Moors. These Jews were not uneducated peasants. An English monk, Theobald of Cambridge, wrote:‘The chief men and rabbis of the Jews who dwell in Spain assembled together at Narbonne, where the Royal Seed resides, and where they are held in the highest esteem.’These are clearly well educated men including rabbi and Princes. Consider this migration, which began around 42 AD, just a few years after the death of Jesus and the knowledge these Jews brought with them. Mary Magdalene is accepted by people in the Languedoc as having set sail for Marseilles. In the boat with her were Mary Jacobe, Mary Salome and Sara, their maid. During a storm at sea the boat was blown sixty miles off course and finally came to shore west of their destination on the coast of the Camargue.To show Notre Dame was the Magdalene and not the Virgin Mother, let me tell you about the town that according to longstanding legend, the boat landed with the three Maries. The developing town was called Notre-Dame-de-la-Mer. The church’s attack on the Magdalene is clear here. This town should be one of the most Holy sites in Christendom. But is it? Not at all, it is a small seaside resort with a fairground. Every attempt has been made to downplay it. Firstly they changed the name from Notre Dame-de-la-Mer to the awkward, Saintes-Maries-de-la-Mer, to disassociate Mary Magdalene from the name Notre Dame. Then they made a concerted effort to even disassociate her completely from the site. All documents say there were three Maries originally in the boat, but now you can see the statue where one Mary is missing. I could not believe my eyes and resented paying three Euros but I had to buy this postcard of the outrage. See it says, Mary Jacob and Mary Salome and even the servant Sara, but no Mary Magdalene! All the stories about Notre Dame-de-la-Mer state that there were three Maries who landed there. But now what used to be three is now two. Have they no shame, changing the name of the Town, removing the Magdalene from the boat. What is strange is that one of the remaining images in the boat is clearly Mary Magdalene with her red hair and her jar at her feet. I wonder if the locals, when they were told to remove Mary Magdalene, removed one of the others in defiance. If they did, well done you guys, for that you deserve a Navette.Navettes are French cookies from Marseilles that are shaped like a boat to commemorate Mary Magdalene and Martha and their voyage to Marseilles. They keep that story alive any way they can.You have of course heard of the prophesies of Nostradamus but you may not have realized the name is a Latinization of Notre Dame. He was born on 14th December 1503 in Saint-Rémy-de-Provence. He was the son of notary Jaume who worked as a physician. Jaume's family had originally been Jewish, but his father, Cresquas, a grain and money dealer based a few miles north in Avignon, had converted to Catholicism around 1460, taking the Christian name ‘Pierre’ and the surname ‘Nostredame’ the saint on whose day his conversion was solemnized. The earliest ancestor who can be identified on the paternal side is Astruge of Carcassonne, who died about 1420. Our young Nostradamus was Christened, Michel Nortredame but became known as Nostradamus. Here are some points to consider. Firstly, his family were Jewish converts and we must wonder which, Notre Dame a Jew would be commemorating, Mary Magdalene famously loved and venerated in this area of France, or the Virgin Mary? Secondly his grandfather lived in Carcassonne the centre of Catharism that the Roman Church in 1209, launched the Albigensian Crusade against that lasted twenty years and wiped out most of the local population who knew the true story of Jesus, not the Roman invention. His father worked in Avignon where the Romanesque church of Notre Dame des Doms was built way back in 1150. This was abandoned and allowed to deteriorate, but was renovated in 1840. A new bell tower was erected in 1859 and placed on top is a massive gilded statue of the Virgin Mary. Is she or is she not Notre Dame des Doms that is the question?The church even invented a new person Mary of Bethany to be Lazarus sister and the one who anoints Jesus but if you look at the Magdalene window in Notre Dame d’Chartres you see all these events these masons tied to the Magdalene. When the Templars were attacked and their leader Jacques Demolay was tied to the stake to be burnt to death on the Island in the Seine he asked to face Notre Dame because he knew quite well which Notre Dame the Masons built that Church to. As did FreeMason Victor Hugo when he wrote the hunchback story.One other interesting point is that the church in attempting to downgrade women and especially Mary Magdalene, the ‘Apostolic Church Order’ makes a huge mistake.‘When the Master blessed the bread and the cup, and assigned them with the words, this is my body and blood, he did not offer them to the women who are with us. Martha said: “He did not offer them to Mary because he saw her laugh.”In their desperation to attack the Magdalene, the fools have admitted both Mary and Martha are at the Last Supper. Mind you it is almost impossible to believe they were not present, as Jesus has been staying every night in their Bethany house for the last five days. So why would they up sticks and go to an empty room in Jerusalem for the Seder which is a family affair and, if you ask any Jew, requires a lot of preparation.‘Martha had a sister called Mary, who sat at the Lord’s feet listening. But Martha was distracted by all the preparations that had to be made. She came to him and asked, “Lord, don’t you care that my sister has left me to do the work by myself? Tell her to help me!” (Luke 10:38) The reason why the church are attacking Notre Dame, Mary Magdalene are not to do with a marriage between The Magdalene and Jesus, which may or may not have happened it is more complex and is to do with what happened after Jesus died. and you can find it here(no-one else will see this but you - https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08T4882RY

If you want to know answers, read this book which I will send you free if you give me your email. Mine is julchip@hotmail.com